How Jesus Got His Copyright Back – Part 3

An Omaha attorney, a "lost" audio tape and Divine intervention send "A Course in Miracles" into public domain


Part 1 Summary: A Course in Miracles is published in book form as the work of Jesus channeled through Columbia University professor Helen Schucman

Part 2 Summary: A Foundation acquires the copyright and sues students for reprinting portions of ACIM

The ghost of Rosemary Woods or the Case of the Lost Tapes. Part of the defense by the Endeavor Academy legal team was that A Course in Miracles is the word and teaching of Jesus and therefore, as channeled information, is public domain. Although some case law supports that contention, it turned out not to be the strongest argument. The word of Jesus wasn’t enough to fight the lawsuit brought by the Foundation for A Course in Miracles, the copyright holder. But divine intervention may have played a part.

To challenge the copyright, Endeavor Academy eventually chose to assert that the copyright should be voided since so many copies of the Course had been disseminated in various forms prior to copyright filing. At least four versions existed and were distributed without restriction before the first 1975 copyrighted edition. One of the reasons Endeavor chose that defense was because of the discovery of some compelling evidence.

“That [it was channeled] was the thrust of Endeavor’s defense in the beginning,” said Omaha attorney Tom Whitmore. “They thought that was a pretty good argument. I don’t want to claim credit for putting the winning argument in their hands because I think they had it before. I do suppose I would claim that I had influence on them focusing more energy on that prior publication issue than they had previously. When they had the summary judgment hearing in 2002, the judge threw out all claims other than the premature publication claim and left that one issue for trial.”

That turned out to be the key point and it wouldn’t have worked but for two crucial pieces of evidence. One was the prior copy of ACIM given to Hugh Lynn Cayce, now called the HLC text, two years before the 1975 copyright.

“Without naming names,” Whitmore demurred, “one of the publications of the Course that was a cornerstone of Judge Sweet’s opinion that the material had already gotten into the public domain was a complete copy of the Course, all three volumes, that Bill Thetford had sent to Hugh Lynn Cayce at the Cayce Institute in Virginia Beach, Va. in 1973. That three-volume set ended up in the library at the Cayce Institute where the public could view it.

“In 1999, a person, or persons, unknown went to that library and withdrew the only remaining volume, the Text portion; took it to a Kinko’s, copied it and brought it back,” Whitmore revealed. “Some say it was done without the approval or knowledge of the librarian on duty; some say otherwise. Nevertheless, a copy of the Hugh Lynn Cayce text got into the hands of some people who transcribed it and put it on the internet.”

To recap the madcap path of miracle texts. “The first version, of course, was the handwritten steno books that Helen wrote down herself [publication 1],” Whitmore related. “From her dictation of those, Bill Thetford typed a triplicate carbon set. That transcription of 2000 pages is called the Urtext [publication 2]. That was subjected to some editing by Bill and Helen correcting grammar and such. That Urtext is now lodged in the Copyright Office and Dr. Wapnick claims, I believe, personal copyright on that material as ‘Schucman’s unpublished notes.’

“From that Urtext, Thetford added headings and chapter breaks and edited out a lot of the personal material. He bound that in what are often called ‘thesis bindings’ and he sent a copy like that to Hugh Lynn Cayce. That is known as the Hugh Lynn Cayce (HLC) version [publication 3]. I think there were about six people, including two at Columbia, who got it.

“The copy retrieved from the Cayce library and submitted for evidence was one of those typewritten versions. I have a photocopy of that original version. That is the version posted on the internet in December of 1999.

“When Wapnick got his copy of the HLC version back in 1973, he said to Schucman that it seemed rough and she agreed. So they did some editing on that one. That edited version became the so-called “Nun’s Version” [publication 4] because it was retyped by Maryknoll nuns. That was the version that was photo-reduced and published as the Criswell edition [publication 5]. It was named such after the woman who helped get it printed. That version was the first one that had a notation of copyright on it.”

The copyright Wapnick eventually acquired in 1999 was based on the 1975 copyright application submitted by the Skutch’s and the Foundation for Inner Peace for that Criswell printing. In the lawsuit, Wapnick, with supporting testimony from Judith Skutch, maintained that the earlier versions prior to the 1975 printing were working manuscripts that existed only in a small number.

Judged Judy and the smoking tapes. Establishing that there were previously distributed copies of ACIM floating around long before the 1975 version was a crucial part of the Endeavor Academy’s defense. The copy of that HLC text was important for that. But an even more compelling piece of evidence seemed to seal the deal. An audiotape was discovered that held the voice of Judith Skutch from a lecture she delivered sometime in the 1970s.

“An interesting story that involves an important piece of evidence involves Joy Steadman from Omaha. She was a member of our group, A Course in Miracles Society and she was traveling to visit her sister in Arizona. She stopped at a friend’s house, a fellow Course student, in Santa Fe.

“She learned that one of the people there, a fellow named Lee, had recorded a Judy Skutch presentation about the Course in Miracles back in the middle 1970s, when the ink was still wet. Lee recalled that in that presentation Skutch had talked about all the enthusiastic copying and distribution of the Course prior to the time the Criswell text had been printed. Now, realize, that is an important point about prior distribution.

“Lee thought he had a copy of that tape. Well, after a few days, he went looking and found it.

“On that tape, you hear Judy Skutch around 1977 saying, ‘Oh, yeah! We printed hundreds of copies of that thing. That’s why we had to print the Criswell because the demand was so strong for it we couldn’t keep up with it at the Xerox machine. Can you imagine a nickel a page?’ The court hearing her own voice saying that was a pretty persuasive piece of evidence for Judge Sweet that there had been prior unrestricted distribution.

“Lee, the man from Arizona, traveled to New York to authenticate it and that was important. In court depositions, Skutch claimed that it was just ‘sales talk,’ hyperbole.

“You know, the story of this legal action is full of miracles. Finding that tape was one of them,” Whitmore smiled.

Next: An Omaha-based group sends Jesus’ words in A Course in Miracles into the public domain.

Be well.

Heartland Healing is a metaphysically based polemic describing alternatives to conventional methods of healing the body, mind and planet. It is provided as information and entertainment, certainly not medical advice. Important to remember and pass on to others: for a weekly dose of Heartland Healing, visit HeartlandHealing.com. and like us on Facebook.


Leave a Reply